Chevron Left
Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment(으)로 돌아가기

뉴욕주립대학교 버펄로 캠퍼스의 Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment 학습자 리뷰 및 피드백

4.7
별점
227개의 평가
68개의 리뷰

강좌 소개

As robots evolve and increasingly interact with humans, enhancing the safety of personnel working with these “collaborative robots” (cobots) is vital. This course equips you to assess the safety of a collaborative robot workcell and prevent the chances of injury or harm. It imparts industry-endorsed safety standards, technical report recommendations and best practices from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Robotic Industries Association (RIA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Learners are introduced to similarities and differences between traditional robots, cobots and conventional machinery before delving into risk assessments, causes of robot accidents and collaborative applications. Material also includes key design techniques for reducing collision forces and a methodology for safety testing. Main concepts are delivered through videos, demos and hands-on exercises. To learn more, please watch the overview video by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-NU710WjM0....

최상위 리뷰

MK

2020년 11월 10일

excellent course , and this course really enhance my knowledge and give me new area for deeply study of cobots . I thank full to all professors and his team . regards

VP

2020년 6월 11일

It was an excellent knowledge gathering exercise. The course was well structured and there is good level of guidance for learning and implementation in the course.

필터링 기준:

Collaborative Robot Safety: Design & Deployment의 68개 리뷰 중 51~68

교육 기관: AndreA O

2020년 12월 19일

The course provides general safety principles for collaborative robots. I find it very useful to know which is the general framework, understand the basic safety elements and have notable references. Very good.

교육 기관: mohit s

2019년 11월 24일

This course is quite good but only thing I felt uncomfortable is about standards taught as they are very tidious to remember

교육 기관: Amanda B V

2022년 3월 11일

Interesting content, very technical. It's too focused on design however. I would have liked some more operational content.

교육 기관: Vladimir I

2021년 7월 31일

Good course, a lot of useful and helpful information, but it is quite superficial and lacks practical challenges.

교육 기관: Gabriel F

2019년 10월 1일

Very good information, tests were not proofread, but everything else was very helpful.

교육 기관: David M

2019년 8월 9일

This course provides an excellent presentation of useful information and methods.

교육 기관: Kedar P

2020년 5월 3일

Please Provide more Visual notes and points like a slide show while speaking.

교육 기관: Muslim A

2020년 6월 24일

Great Course and meet industry standards

교육 기관: chanakya j

2020년 5월 27일

very good and useful content

교육 기관: siddharth a m R

2020년 4월 29일

good course

교육 기관: Faisal A D A

2021년 10월 9일

helpful

교육 기관: CHANDRASHEKAR G V

2020년 5월 7일

GOOD

교육 기관: Don W

2020년 4월 30일

This is an interesting, informative course on a very specific subject. It gives a very good overview of the use of robots which interact in the same areas as people. However, the course appears to be orphaned. The forums point out a few dead links and exam question errors, but no one from the course has responded in over a year.

교육 기관: Ankit S

2020년 5월 30일

The course was okay.

The instructor was good.

though, i expected to learn some programming for safety parameters which were not at all covered in this course. This is an improvement that i would suggest.

교육 기관: Arun U

2021년 8월 4일

Great learning objectives. But poor delivery. Most of the referred articles are heavily paid articles or unavailable. The resources are not reviewed over years. Speakers are monotonous.

교육 기관: SARAANSH S

2021년 4월 20일

Basic course for developing your knowledge about collaborative robots. Hazards related to it and some mitigation methods.

교육 기관: M.R N D

2020년 9월 16일

Good course

교육 기관: Jessica N

2020년 2월 17일

The transcripts for the videos are clearly not reviewed and include word substitution errors that could possibly be made by software or by someone who has English as a second language and erroneously selected a similar-sounding word. In some cases, you can figure out what is trying to be conveyed, but in other cases it's pretty confusing. Some of the additional resources are just advertisements from companies trying to sell their robots. Some of the additional resources links don't work. Some of the questions in the quizzes make no sense, partly because of incorrect word substitutions. Other issues include a yes/no question in week 4 where the "yes" answer and the "no" answer each provided an explanation after either the yes or the no... but the yes and the no were attached to the wrong explanations, thus causing the answers to be illogical and false. Another question asks about an arm being pinned by a robot, but the answer it wants is the answer for the user's palm being pinned. The palm is mentioned in the question, but the arm is the part the question says is pinned- so the answer the test wants is not the answer the question asks. The video in week 4 is terrible, and doesn't really effectively answer the question associated with it.