This was mostly review for me though probability especially Beyes Theorem derivation was new. The instructors provided clear often refreshing ways to look at material.\n\nThank you for a great class!!
This course syllabus is great. It starts wonderfully. Week 1 to 4 is taught by Paul Bendich, and Daniel Egger the instruction is awesome. Effective way to refresh and add the Data Science math skills!
교육 기관: karri D R•
교육 기관: ALOKE R B•
교육 기관: Paurush K•
교육 기관: Prashant M K•
교육 기관: Prerna S•
교육 기관: Nagraj t•
교육 기관: Nishant S•
교육 기관: Perumali S•
교육 기관: LIJIN W•
교육 기관: AVINASH K•
교육 기관: Labib U•
교육 기관: AVALA S•
교육 기관: Sunil R•
교육 기관: Mitesh G M•
교육 기관: TEJASWINI D•
교육 기관: Prateek G•
교육 기관: SREERAM S•
교육 기관: Jay Y•
교육 기관: Amin A•
교육 기관: Nagaraj A M•
교육 기관: nikhil k•
well the initial part of the course is very basic .. too basic.. the course doesn't scale up with the first 3 weeks. but the instructor is clear and makes concept easy to understand. but things change in the fourth week. the course shifts gears from very easy to intermediate. without much guidance.. or examples
math skills are to be practiced i hope the instructors level out the difficulty level in the course. An ideal math course should have many examples to practice with constant involvement of the instructors , support guys.
just 5 or 10 problems doesn't get you much and when asked to pass with 80% is tough.
. i left the course in week 4 and again completed after i understood week 4 content better.
this course doesn't have many many of the math skills required for data science.
ideally a math course should scale up from simple easy to intermediate to hard and later challenging questions and final assignment should have a combination of first 3 and passing of 70 to 75..
so the course requires
a. more examples for practice with solutions atleast 20 -25 both solved and unsolved
b. more math topics to make it more comprehensive for data science
c. more involvement overall
교육 기관: Brendan S•
I definitely learned a lot in this course, and, as someone who has historically avoided mathematics, I think it is a fairly good introduction to these concepts for people at my level. However, I think the course was somewhat inconsistent. The final module could really use some more explanation and examples. Probability is a very abstract field, and it can be difficult to take real world examples and translate them into formulas. I think that the module would benefit greatly from spending some extra time on translating english-language situations into formulas. There were also some non-trivial errors in the videos that need to be corrected. Overall, I'm pretty happy with the course but I think it doesn't yet fill out its potential.
교육 기관: F K•
The first two weeks of the course were well explained. But when it came to the probability, the course was confusing so that I had to search for more sources and learn from YouTube. I have been away from math for a long time, so I took this course which is described as for the beginners. I was extremely confused and disappointed about myself for not understanding the concept of Bayes Theorem for example. But when I checked other sources on YouTube, I could understand it easily and only then I was able to answer the quiz questions. So many basic concepts such as Tree diagram which are extremely helpful for grasping the theories and using them in real life situations were not even mentioned.
교육 기관: Jean-Baptiste B•
Pretty good, overall the explanations are clear and the exercises/practice quizzes are really useful to understand the material.
Negative points: the last part on Bayes' Rule and the Binomial Theorem is a bit too fast, and I needed to supplement it by external material to fully understand it. And it would have been great to have a part about linear algebra and maybe calculus, but I guess there were some time and financial constraints that did not allow that.
I still recommend this course, that's a really good refresher or intro. You'll need to supplement it by other material, though.
교육 기관: William M•
The positives first: Brought me up to speed on important statistics and probability information for my future career.
The not so good: The second instructor does not need to show his face. That was very distracting.
There was no working often provided in the course notes. Sometimes when I would work through a problem I would make one calculation error and couldn't easily figure out which one it was. I would prefer if they would show each calculation step by step. That would have made things a LOT faster and easier. Instead I relied to brainly, which is a great website.