Chevron Left
Engineering Practices for Building Quality Software(으)로 돌아가기

미네소타 대학교의 Engineering Practices for Building Quality Software 학습자 리뷰 및 피드백

190개의 평가
27개의 리뷰

강좌 소개

Agile embraces change which means that team should be able to effectively make changes to the system as team learns about users and market. To be good at effectively making changes to the system, teams need to have engineering rigor and excellence else embracing change becomes very painful and expensive. In this course, you will learn about engineering practices and processes that agile and traditional teams use to make sure the team is prepared for change. In additional, you will also learn about practices, techniques and processes that can help team build high quality software. You will also learn how to calculate a variety of quantitative metrics related to software quality. This is an intermediate course, intended for learners with a background in software development. To succeed in the course, you should have experience developing in modern programming languages (e.g., Java, C#, Python, JavaScript), an understanding of software development lifecycle models, familiarity with UML diagrams (class and sequence diagrams), and a desire to better understand quality aspects of software development beyond program correctness. At the end of this course, you will be able to comfortably and effectively participate in various techniques and processes for building secure and high quality software....

최상위 리뷰

2021년 3월 24일

Overall the course is good but there should be more videos from instructor then reading assignments links because I could not understand them well.

2020년 3월 31일

Delivery and explanation was very clear. Happy for joining in coursera to enhance my knowledge.

필터링 기준:

Engineering Practices for Building Quality Software의 27개 리뷰 중 26~27

교육 기관: Rajendra A

2020년 11월 27일

The tests rating could be improved better. Most peer review evaluation having rating as 0 or 1/15/ other value, which make very challenging to evaluate and give rating. Candidates has written something however not enough inline with rubic, so what could be rating? Definitely not 0 as there is information and with this option left is next higher rating which is full value. And full value would not be right again as there is some information missing as per rubic.

교육 기관: Marta L

2021년 8월 9일

This course is having much to many readings - they do are interesting sometimes, but this is not the form I'd be expecting from an online course. The videos are relatively boring, with few slides that are vastly discussed, but without major substance. Obviously it did give me an overview, but it's not a very sophisticated course.