Chevron Left
Evaluations of AI Applications in Healthcare(으)로 돌아가기

스탠퍼드 대학교의 Evaluations of AI Applications in Healthcare 학습자 리뷰 및 피드백

121개의 평가
32개의 리뷰

강좌 소개

With artificial intelligence applications proliferating throughout the healthcare system, stakeholders are faced with both opportunities and challenges of these evolving technologies. This course explores the principles of AI deployment in healthcare and the framework used to evaluate downstream effects of AI healthcare solutions. The Stanford University School of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Visit the FAQs below for important information regarding 1) Date of original release and Termination or expiration date; 2) Accreditation and Credit Designation statements; 3) Disclosure of financial relationships for every person in control of activity content....

최상위 리뷰


2022년 4월 7일

This course was really valuable for linking and embedding my knowledge gained by reading FDA guidance documents and knowledge sharing from my Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs colleagues


2021년 3월 5일

This is a holistic course giving all perspectives and knowledge on the different aspects of evaluating all kind of AI driven solutions in healthcare. A must do for all healthcare Managers.

필터링 기준:

Evaluations of AI Applications in Healthcare의 31개 리뷰 중 26~31

교육 기관: Natalia K

2021년 8월 25일

There are several mistakes in the final exam questions. Check back. In terms of meaning, you can guess about the correct answer, but you need to fix it.

교육 기관: Richard J

2021년 4월 7일


교육 기관: Wael A

2021년 9월 5일

Instructor is reading a script, better slides required particularly when reciting examples. Could be better structured.

교육 기관: Yuanqin M

2021년 1월 21일

too many theories but no practica examples or exercises

교육 기관: Francesca M B

2022년 1월 8일

Very US focused

교육 기관: Ferrum H

2021년 9월 21일

Lots of material, but the presentation was not in line with good learning practices. Information was presented very rapidly and dryly. Course bounced around a lot from topic to topic without a clear summary of what was learned at the end. Lots of industry buzzwords without really clearly connecting how to apply in real life situations.