2019년 5월 30일
The assessments were excellent. Initially, I did have hesitation in getting started, but got hooked to the assessments. Thank you to Kavya and Steve, our Program Managers who encouraged us everyday.
2019년 4월 22일
complete view of the businesses related to each type, separated into different sections, but with a clear explanations that the different types are interlinked into a bigger picture
교육 기관: Seth P•
2020년 6월 10일
Good, but it is a little tricky the last test in week 4.
교육 기관: Choongo M•
2020년 5월 5일
Very good introductory course to the FinTech disruption.
교육 기관: Rauf N•
2018년 2월 15일
Interesting and very educative at the foundation level.
교육 기관: Fabio B•
2019년 5월 24일
A bit more material for study would help a lot.
교육 기관: Lina M•
2020년 6월 20일
Literature and business cases are not updated.
교육 기관: Victoire C•
2021년 11월 18일
Good. Better with COVID situation updates
교육 기관: Rey M S•
2020년 10월 21일
a very interesting and challenging..😊😊
교육 기관: Grace E•
2020년 6월 28일
I really enjoyed the course and content.
교육 기관: YUDHA S P•
2019년 7월 8일
having many new insights by this course
교육 기관: Sara A•
2021년 2월 8일
I learn about important new things
교육 기관: Melvin M•
2020년 4월 28일
excellent course, nicely presented
교육 기관: Jurgita Z•
2021년 4월 17일
Some videos don't exist any more
교육 기관: Jaydeep N P•
2020년 6월 6일
Can be updated with latest data
교육 기관: Jane K T•
2021년 6월 15일
Quite compact & understandable
교육 기관: Swetlana F•
2019년 7월 17일
Too much of reading than video
교육 기관: Samra A R H•
2021년 9월 25일
it was a great experience
교육 기관: Victor H•
2019년 10월 14일
Thank you very much
교육 기관: Juan I F L•
2018년 7월 22일
교육 기관: Sourabh B•
2020년 2월 11일
Overall the design of the module is very nice, and they are stacked in an organized way. The way they are taught are also very helpful and easy to understand.
However here are some key issues:
I) Some of the press articles / white papers are quite dated – as old as 2012. Naturally, some of them have lost their relevance in today’s time (more so when we are discussing about digital disruption in Financial Services sector). These materials should get replaced with more relevant content.
II) The YouTube video tutorials on Applepay does not work anymore (a message pops up – This video is private)
III) All three links on the implications (implications for banks, customers and society) of Open Banking do not work, and there are questions on the assessment section on this implication part. It’s difficult to answer a question without going through the materials offered.
IV) Certain questions on the assessment sections are carrying grammatical mistakes (eg. for the final assessment module of Week 2 - Money Makes the World go Around, Q3, Q11 are wrongly framed). Though one can understand the questions, however wrong English is not desirable from an Institution offering Education
V) The framework on few of the questions are difficult to understand. There is a question on Core Banking Activities, I could not figure out the right answer. But I believe I have fair knowledge on what is Core Banking. I could not find out a way on how I can get the answer that is right according to Coursera. So once candidates completes their assessment, there should be a way to know the correct answer in case someone is unable to answer the right. I am not sure if there is a way to find out the right answer post completion of assessment.
VI) There are few questions who have lost the present day context. An example – there is a question on whether present day banks are equipped to offer a gamut of digital solutions to its customers with the option to choose from Yes or No. In present day context, it cannot be said that today’s banks are completely ill-equipped to offer such services, as a lot of banks / financial institutions have made significant developments in digital offerings (payments, eKYC, mobile apps etc.). Hence for such questions, there should be relevance with present day context.
I hope Coursera will look into this.
교육 기관: RAUL B•
2018년 5월 23일
Considero que el curso da una visión general en cuanto a lo que tiene que ver con innovación financiera, pero me hubiera gustado entender mejor qué Fintechs están siendo realmente exitosas y cómo lo han logrado, al igual que la forma en la que las instituciones financieras pueden colaborar con este tipo de empresas para delegarles aquéllos servicios financieros que éstas pueden hacer mejor, de forma más rápida y económica. Tenía como expectativa conocer el mundo de las Fintechs en mayor detalle y además me hubiera gustado que el curso hubiera sido más dinámico.
교육 기관: Cláudia T•
2021년 7월 29일
Unfortunately not met my expectations since most of the course was based on reading articles which most of them were outdated (like from 2014, wikipedia source) so it was quite disappointing.
I have done other course before named The Future of Payment Technologies (by University of Michigan) which was more based on videos by the instructor, very well structured and more self-explained.
교육 기관: Dong W•
2019년 9월 4일
Some of the contents are pretty well designed and contains rich scope of information, can help to deepen the understanding of the industry, but there are some useful resources with breaking links which is a pity and some quiz are really badly designed with larges of confisions and no practical meanings, especially in the week 4, I wasted lots of time on that.
교육 기관: Vivek P•
2021년 7월 8일
Course is informative, however the text has many typos and spelling errors, some even in the quizzes. The design of the quizzes also lack some clarity. When we have questions with 'select all that apply' with 5 or more choices, there should either be partial credit or some explanation should be provided in the feedback.
교육 기관: Belen S•
2017년 11월 21일
I expected more worked content. Most of the videos are describing wikipedia definitions even with the same text order which is written in the web. Also in some Quiz the answers were difficult to find out in the learnt materials. Many times the correct answers were imprecise (example: question 1 in Week 4´s Quiz)
교육 기관: Abhiram P•
2019년 2월 3일
The course started of really well with first two weeks material and videos which are engaging and interesting.
However, the latter part of the course is more of reading material than videos and hardly there is any explanation. The quality of material and the quizzes in week 4 and week 3 is relatively poor.