Interesting contents, good introduction.

First two chapters are quite alright. Later modules have received less attention from the makers. The readings often consist of references to Wikipedia pages and magazine articles (which are missing some depth and sometimes require registration). I found that one video transcript resembled the Wikipedia page about that topic a lot...

Some video's stop before the lecturer has stopped speaking...

It doesn't seem like the course is being updated as there are a number of broken links (preventing of hindering you to pass assessments). Assessment questions could be better as there is too much room for interpretation.

A lot of participants have complained about the assessments in the discussion forums, but no reaction from moderators for years. If you want a certificate for this course, prepare to be frustrated!

The content was okay, but there were several points, I did not like about the course. As a summary, much less professional than other courses.

1) There were many references to public sources like youtube or wikipedia - the reason for subscribing here is just to learn more than from these public sources.

2) In the video, there not much good visualisation to support the presentation (e.g. no or small graphics)

3) The editing of the videos is not always good, a couple of times, the video is just cut off in the end.

4) The Danish professor was not always easy to unterstand.

5) In the quizzes, it was not always clear how to answer (e.g. the answer consisted of three words which had to be given separated by comma, but there was no hint how to do it, so you had to try & error)

I honestly didn't think this course was a great use of time. The readings are mostly links to wikipedia pages, and they don't connect particularly well to the videos. The quizzes and assessments also seem like broken tools. The answers seem arbitrary, sometimes aren't in the course material, and don't actually test your knowledge of the subject. The grading is very nit-picky and thus the quizzes are nearly impossible to pass. I'm convinced certain questions on the last exam (in Week 4) simply don't have a correct answer.

Course and topic is actually pretty interesting and is actually good for beginners which is a thumbs up. However, most links used came from wikipedia and many links provided are actually broken or redirects to the homepage of the website and not the article. Lastly, I would like to emphasize that the some questions on the final exam of module 4 will be answered purely based on luck or good guess because the readings and links are already broken hence would not be able to answer the question correctly.

Some of the parts were not basic but kindergarten level. The lecturer is getting worse in speaking in english each course. The test are sometimes prepared wrong. When answering question the way it should be it sometimes shows mistake, even if it is not - simply the lecturer did not mentioned it in the video.

Content and links partly not up to date. Little to no support from the mentors in the discussion forums. Had to wait quite some time to get my peer-to-peer review so that I could not finish the course on my on schedule which is frustrating as it is a monthly subscription.

Lot of missing content. The video on Apple Pay is missing on Youtube. The reading content on the OpenBanking's impact on Customer Bank and Society is missing. It leads to a page not found error. Content is stale from 2018. Nothing new.

The presenter is very difficult to understand and the quizzes are absolutely rubbish: they are full of typos and poor grammar, and the questions and answers themselves are not well thought out at all.

Very high level information. Mostly refers to Wikipedia articles or magazine articles, that too outdated articles published 3-4 years back. Very little original course content.

A large number of links don't work or are behind paywalls. Others are 5 year old articles, there is so much information out there this is disappointing

Really poor. Explains extremmely basic concepts and abuse in the using of web URLs (lot of them were down). Don't recommend.

Course could have been more interactive and could have had more vidoes. It just hjad some links for self study

Week 4 final assignment was rubbish. It doesn't allow people to pass though the answers were correct.

Terrible editing, but a nice course to get a flavour of Fintech and where things are heading

Too many wikipedia references and less engaging instructional videos.

The level an quality was deeply reduced in the fourth week

only good for those who know nothing about fintech

Too superficial, zero challenging and easy.

very basic course

Soy usuaria de Coursera desde hace muchos años, y en estos días con ocasión de la pandemia decidí actualizarme en Transformación Digital y mi frustración ha sido absoluta. Artículos recomendados de 2014 cuando estamos en 2020, links de Wikipedia como referencia, cifras de 2016, en fin un curso totalmente desactualizado y que pierde vigencia porque en temas digitales la evolución ha sido significativa en los últimos años. De los peores materiales que he visto.

Unbelievably poor. As others point out, there is no decent content, you often cannot understand what the guy is trying to say, there are loads of spelling mistakes, the module passes you onto outdated websites, the questions are ridiculous and often do not match either the content or the answers. Do not waste your time and money. This 'course' should be deleted.

The course content was quite old and did not contain any examples from India and China where the variety of new payment methods are being used on large scale. All the English was not at all up to the standard and lots of spelling and grammatical errors. And some of the questions were quite ambiguous.

This is a horrible course, some copy pasted links about some random topics, barely informative for someone who already is active in financial tech or banking, quizzes have arguable answers, presenter is horrible with his manners and speech, horrible, below every par good modern education should meet

Course is very much scattered, needs to improve a lot. Could include some justification with real-time case studies. Just giving links of Wikipedia and youtube.

Basic overview and wikipedia links!! One can easily find all the information by himself with some effort on the Internet.