강좌 소개
최상위 리뷰
LL
Jan 20, 2016
This is a very good introduction to game theory having never before studied this subject I have found that the Lectures are easy to understand and flow very well from one to the other.
LY
Dec 17, 2017
Simple to follow, focuses on introducing basic concepts rather than the math. Could be more in-depth though. Nonetheless, great precursor to the Game Theory course from Stanford.
Welcome to Game Theory의 208개 리뷰 중 201~208
교육 기관: Alejandro B
•Mar 13, 2016
While the subject is interesting, the professor sometimes makes it confusing and dense to understand the basic ideas.
Maybe this course does need a mathematic or economic background...
교육 기관: Rashi K
•Feb 23, 2016
good to begin with!
교육 기관: Rishabh B
•Jan 05, 2016
Video Orientation is not proper.
교육 기관: James H
•May 01, 2016
The course was useful in providing an introduction to the basics of game theory.
However it would benefit from a native English proofread and smoother delivery.
There were also problems throughout regarding the display of graphics and notes behind the professor, who kept pointing to something other than he was referring to.
A couple of math notations were also incorrect, for example "<" when the professor said "less than or equal to".
Overall though, I'm pleased that I took the course and I learned several important aspects of the topic that will benefit me in future study.
교육 기관: Kathia A
•May 01, 2017
WAS SO BORING!!
교육 기관: MARLE T M
•Mar 02, 2018
No acabé la primer semana, el profesor titubea, repite palabras, es difícil seguirlo y los ejemplos confusos
교육 기관: Jonathan G
•Feb 07, 2018
I call false advertising! This course has nothing to do with what it claimed to be. Strategy is something entirely different than mathematics.
교육 기관: Ze L
•May 04, 2017
It's good for a course of 3 hours in high school but definitely not a college-level one. I almost finished the quiz and exams without going through the videos. If the course can't challenge an outsider, he will not benefit from it either.
And there lacks a "further reading or material" part, the basic models are not satisfying. (I thought there would be a introduction to Zermelo's theorem ...)
I hope more interesting models could be introduced.
