Chevron Left
Grant Proposal(으)로 돌아가기

모스크바 물리 기술원의 Grant Proposal 학습자 리뷰 및 피드백

33개의 평가
9개의 리뷰

강좌 소개

The course provides guidance on developing a strong application that will allow reviewers to better evaluate the science and merit of your proposal. You will learn how to put your ideas into proper words, arrange a clear and concise paper and search grant market for potential funder. You will also learn how to react to negative feedback from reviewers and resubmit your proposal. The course focuses on useful project management tools and possible budget pitfalls....

최상위 리뷰

필터링 기준:

Grant Proposal의 10개 리뷰 중 1~10

교육 기관: Thomas P T C

Jan 27, 2019

A very informative and well-designed course with content relevant not just to grant proposal writing but project management more broadly. Thank you very much, Dr. Bazanova and Dr. Sosedova!

교육 기관: Heidi G

Mar 07, 2018

This class was

교육 기관: Irek V

Dec 19, 2016

Best of the best.

교육 기관: Caplescu A

Jan 02, 2017

the examples were helpful to match the theory in practice

the recomended reading materials and resources are very helpful for further, deeper study of the subject

despite having worked already on several grant proposals and having some previous practical experience on writing, i finished the course in 2 days as i couldn't wait any more! it was very well structured and i even learned new tricks and things to bare in mind when writing. big thank you!

교육 기관: Kyra W

Oct 31, 2017

Very informative and this is exactly where grant writing is headed in American in these next few years the changes have already begun so I feel like I'm ahead of the curve after going through and recording the lessons.

교육 기관: miriam r

Oct 16, 2017

thank you

교육 기관: FARIDA O

Apr 24, 2018

Great explanation, Great space. I love it

교육 기관: ∞

May 03, 2017

Tough but useful

교육 기관: cynthia

Aug 14, 2017

This course was informative and useful for writing grants. I would like to see for practice exercises

교육 기관: Pysarenko D

Jul 29, 2019

The theoretical part of the Course is great. I also liked the peer-grading assignments we had. However, the Practice Quiz part requires improvements: sometimes it's difficult to make an input as the field size for the text does not correspond the length of the text required. What is more, there are some questions in quizzes that do not have a specific answer, however, it is not possible to answer them as the publisher locked a concrete answer and whatever you write there (even if it is a correct statement) it is marked as incorrect.