스탠퍼드 대학교의 Introduction to Mathematical Thinking 학습자 리뷰 및 피드백
강좌 소개
최상위 리뷰
AM
Nov 24, 2019
It was an amazing course! Lots of interesting content. The content is also explained really well, i found it really easy to understand. The assessments are a little challenging, but reasonably sized.
NR
Mar 05, 2018
An awesome course. Very easy to follow at the start, becomes more challenging at the end. I have a PhD in economics yet I struggled with the real analysis at the end. And that's just intro level! :-D
Introduction to Mathematical Thinking의 427개 리뷰 중 401~425
교육 기관: Javier G
•Oct 25, 2019
Only the last unit was hard to understand, as I think it wasn´t well explained. I recommend this course.
교육 기관: Kirk S
•Mar 30, 2019
Pretty awesome. I learned a lot. It wasn't easy, as this was mostly new material. Fascinating stuff.
교육 기관: Joseph A D
•Mar 14, 2017
A very enjoyable introduction to proofs, number theory, and some real analysis.
교육 기관: Bennett
•Apr 15, 2018
Good course. Have learned a lot along the way, more than only mathematics.
교육 기관: Mehmet S T
•Jun 03, 2017
It was really nice... I hope there will be the second part of this course.
교육 기관: Michael A
•Mar 16, 2017
Excellent course, introducing a difficult concept very well
교육 기관: NOVAL R
•Dec 13, 2018
It's very mind blowing approach for studying math.
교육 기관: Anar
•May 14, 2019
will update my review after finishing the course
교육 기관: yash g
•Sep 04, 2017
A good course to strengthen the foundations.
교육 기관: C.Sundara p
•Dec 21, 2017
i enjoyed and learned the course
교육 기관: Shubham S
•Aug 11, 2017
I was expecting something more
교육 기관: Nishtha C
•Jul 27, 2020
Unique approach. Commendable.
교육 기관: Mahmoud M K Z
•Apr 05, 2020
cloud use more visual aid
교육 기관: Deleted A
•Jul 21, 2017
Excellent Course
교육 기관: Nicholas K
•Jun 08, 2019
Good course.
교육 기관: prakash s
•Aug 28, 2018
nice course.
교육 기관: MOYILLA N K T
•May 14, 2018
very good
교육 기관: Mitul D
•Aug 03, 2019
best
교육 기관: thuonghien
•Oct 08, 2018
good
교육 기관: Almaz
•Dec 29, 2017
completely disagree with evaluation exercises as it allows to get >= 12 points for completely wrong solution. It's better to use [0,7] based system as used in IMO. it makes more sense and checks problem solving, not ability to bullshit
교육 기관: Digby D
•Dec 12, 2017
A more mathematical approach to Formal Logic. Good alternative to Intro to Logic (also from Stanford) for STEM students if they don't like the format of Intro to Logic.
교육 기관: Zhenqin L
•Dec 19, 2017
老师很幽默。讲的很细致，可是没人最后改我的作业，以后不交钱了。
교육 기관: zjm2017
•Mar 04, 2017
useful
교육 기관: Yonatan G S
•Jul 04, 2017
Tengo Problemas con la traducción al Español, me notificaron que este curso tenia subtitulo en español me voy a dar baja.
교육 기관: Aldo J M V
•Dec 24, 2019
I disagree with the way the rubrics are designed. It should be called "think as I do"
