Aug 19, 2019
The course was well designed and delivered by all the trainers with the help of case study and great examples.\n\nThe forums and discussions were really useful and helpful while doing the assignments.
Oct 17, 2016
Very good overview of ML. The GraphLab api wasn't that bad, and also it was very wise of the instructors to allow the use of other ML packages. Overall i enjoyed it very much and also leaned very much
교육 기관: Diogo J A P•
Feb 15, 2016
With a funny and welcoming look and feel, this course introduces machine learning through a hands-on approach, that enables the student to properly understand what ML is all about. Very nicely done!
교육 기관: Pooja M•
Aug 19, 2019
The course was well designed and delivered by all the trainers with the help of case study and great examples.
The forums and discussions were really useful and helpful while doing the assignments.
교육 기관: Karthik M•
Dec 27, 2018
A good course to understand the basics of Machine Learning. The only issue is the use of Graphlab library. Since it only works on Python 2.7, it is not convenient for people who prefer Python 3
교육 기관: Alexandru B•
Jan 21, 2016
Great course. Very informative and inspirational. I got tons of ideas from it! Thank you
교육 기관: Mallikarjuna R V•
Jan 17, 2019
Wonderful opportunity to learn and execute hands on coding of Machine Learning. The amazing task that Machine Learning methods and algorithms does behind scene is understood for the following cases / intelligent applications:
1. Regression (e.g. Predicting House Price etc.)
2. Classification (e.g. Product review sentiment, Spam detection, Medical diagnosis etc.)
3. Clustering and Similarity (e.g. Grouping news articles)
4. Recommender (e.g. Amazon personalized product recommendations, Netflix personalized Movie recommendations etc.)
5. Deep Learning and Deep Features (e.g. Google image search, Image-based filtering etc.)
The main challenge for me was to code using “Python3, Pandas and SciKit-Learn” instead of “Python2, GraphLab Create and SFrame”. I am now confident to develop intelligent applications based on Machine Learning. Thanks to Professors (Emily and Carlos) and to Ashok Leyland-HR for giving me this opportunity.
교육 기관: akashkr1498•
Jan 18, 2019
lacture was good but one point i want to share to you don't use rare tools for assignment personally i faced lots of problem while installing graphlab better to switch to some common tools like sklearn python platform .
교육 기관: Yuvraj S•
Feb 01, 2019
It is a good course if we take into account the foundational part. But since only one library has been used to solve the issues, one does not explore and write their own functions.
교육 기관: Jaime R•
Dec 17, 2018
Great introduction course. However, getting the notebooks to work with Graphlab is a real pain. The notebook exercises are also mostly make-work rather than real explorations. The explanations and the notebooks themselves are pretty good though
교육 기관: Jefferson N•
Feb 13, 2019
A good course, but the tools are a bit dated and it's showing its age.
교육 기관: Igor K•
Jun 18, 2016
I can only infer that this course's target audience is rich pregnant women who care about shoe shopping and celebrities. Unfortunately I am none of those things and had to cringe my way through the examples, watching the videos at 2x speed.
The course itself is incredibly shallow, even for a survey course, and basically serves as an ad for one of the professors' own products -- Graphlab Create. You'll be much better off taking Andrew Ng's course, which is significantly more in depth and forces you to write your own solutions to problems instead of relying on a proprietary library.
The only reason to prefer this course is if you really dislike the idea of using matlab.
교육 기관: Nafi A K•
Oct 15, 2017
the course contains misleading information about a capstone project that I discovered -by coincidence - that is no longer exists, the video introduction and the final videos is mentioning the capstone project time and again ! , I think this is a major problem bacause such project was one of the most usefull demonstration of the skills that one could acquire from the course, if I knew this before I would not have enrolled in this course, unfortunatly I discovered this when I am already in the second Regression course!
교육 기관: Dmitry V•
Apr 01, 2016
I'm sorry, but this is just ridiculous. I can't recommend this course to anyone. It's all about advertizing: Emily Fox can't stop but recommend Amazon services, and Carlos Guestrin does the same for his Dato's Graphlab Create, which is might be great in general, but absolutely useless in educational purposes. The practice part of every week is just a waste of the time.
I can't say "money well spent".
교육 기관: 郑轶松•
Dec 27, 2015
LIKE an advertisment!
Why not use pandas and numpy sk-learn?
Open source is more popular!
교육 기관: Arun J•
Sep 18, 2018
not useful since the material covered lacks any rigor.
교육 기관: Mike L•
Sep 07, 2016
Might be good for someone looking for a casual overview?
I really wanted to like this course, and was excited about the series. Very disappointing. Refunded after scoring 100% on first three weeks and watching the theory portion of week 4. I was familiar, with the subject prior to taking this course; was hoping for a deep dive.
Too many trivially short and low information density videos. Handwavy mathematics. I would have liked to get a more solid idea of the depth of the series from the first course before committing money.
Default software for the course has near-zero market penetration (per indeed.com), unless maybe you work at Apple -- not really excusable for something that purports real-world value. Yes, you can use other software, *except for the capstone*, per another reviewer: this is fatal.
Presenters just not fully prepared to lecture on the topic: the nail in the coffin was the end of the week 4 lectures on clustering: "So, at this point, you really should be able to go out there and build a really cool retrieval system for doing news article retrieval. Or any other really, really, really cool retrieval that I can't think of right now. But of course there's lots of interesting examples. So go out there and think of ideas that I can't think of right now." Really? How about: "Cut! Take two."
Many poor design choices for the presentation. Too much time spent writing things on slides that should have already been on the slides.
As of this review: no reviews on the last courses in the series, and some poor (but indicative) reviews of the other courses.
교육 기관: Shane C•
Nov 16, 2016
I did not find the course very good. I came into the class with only real basic knowledge of Python and I was hoping to be able to pick up more as part of this class. WHile I might have picked up more, it was only because I used resources outside the course.
The video instructions in programming in Python left quite a few gaps to figure out by reading documentation. The videos themselves were divided into two sections -- first a theoretical or classroom like section and a second a lab/programming section going over some coding in Python. The 'classroom' type lectures were pretty reasonably good. But the lab/programming were pretty terrible.
They instructor really break down the syntax of the code and just left the student to figure it out. This made being able to take this code and to adapt it to other uses very difficult.
I would not recommend this as a course to help learn Python.
교육 기관: Mike C•
Jun 14, 2016
The course is basically an advertisement for the software one of the teachers created. I did learn a bit of high level concepts, but when it comes to coding, the answers is always 'conveniently, my software does this for you'. I wanted to actually learn about these concepts deeper, and implement them.
I also was able to complete this 6 week paid course in a few days which should not be possible. I have since started the free Stanford course taught by a co-founder of coursera, and it is MUCH better! I recommend it to anyone!
교육 기관: Jonathan W•
May 31, 2019
The course includes some good, basic, information on machine learning. The instructors seem to know the material well. However, the exercises and coding are based on a python package written by one of the authors that, while free to students, does not easily translate into common packages such as Numpy, Scipy, Scikit-learn, Theano, TensorFlow, Keras, PyTorch, and Pandas. Also, the package used only works in Python 2 (which will no longer be supported as of January 2020).
교육 기관: Valentin T•
Jan 17, 2016
Using a proprietary library instead of widely used libraries and discouraging the use of open source widely used libraries. It barely compiles, the example notebook has method calls that use non existing methods of the SFrame object.
The course claims that it teaches the student how useful practical knowledge but then ends up using a non standard library and saying not to use pandas or scikit learn.
교육 기관: Yaron K•
Jul 13, 2016
The Lecturers are very enthusiastic, but I was hoping for examples and assignments based on Pandas and Skikit-Learn. Instead the course examples and assignments are based on a machine learning package called Graphlab, that stopped working when it was upgraded to version 2 (there are workarounds that enable it to work locally, but clearly it isn't "enterprise ready")
교육 기관: Hugo N M•
Feb 07, 2016
The course has a fundamental problem, it relies completely on a library developed by one of the instructors, which is not open source. In the end, it seems like a big opportunity of delivering a marketing campaign by the instructors then otherwise.
I definitely will not spend time and money on the other courses of this specialization.
교육 기관: Charlotte E•
Apr 12, 2016
I feel like it should have been mentioned a lot clearer before starting that this was simply a course in how to use the creators library. These skills are not transferable anywhere else as I would have to pay to use them in future! Would have been a lot more useful as a how to for sci-kit and pandas.
교육 기관: john p•
May 13, 2016
No Open Source Libraries, this course is not educational; it is a sales pitch to use their expensive software. Good luck having an employer pay this amount of money for software when they can hire employees that can use free open source libraries.
교육 기관: Christopher W•
Oct 15, 2015
The fact that the class uses GraphLab instead of pandas/numpy/sklearn should have been stated up front
The course felt like an advertisement for the professor's toolkit
It was very disappointing that the equivalent standard workflow was not supported
교육 기관: Alejandro•
Jun 13, 2016
Shame that it was not possible to progress with this course without using graphlab which the creator of this course himself created. Please see the course as just a training sales promotion for his ML application.