Chevron Left
Scholarly Communication(으)로 돌아가기

모스크바 물리 기술원의 Scholarly Communication 학습자 리뷰 및 피드백

181개의 평가
56개의 리뷰

강좌 소개

Scholarly Communication is a concise but comprehensive course on how to write research papers in English. The course will help the candidates gain a better understanding of the rhetorical conventions of English and the common challenges the candidates may face as an academic writer. The course provides instruction, exercises, structure, and deadlines needed to create a publishable paper. The aim of the course is to improve competence in scholarly communications by deepening knowledge of the core features of the scientific writing style. It presents and analyzes the unwritten rules of scientific writing, the ones candidates most likely never learned in academic writing. The course will enable the candidates to write clear, detailed and well-structured scientific texts appropriate to a suitable academic journal. In particular, they will develop an awareness of fundamental concepts of academic writing, such as contrastive rhetoric, logical organization, and argumentation. In addition, they will develop skills for self-editing and revision techniques, including editing for precision and clarity. They will also gain a deeper understanding of how to prepare a scientific paper using the IMRAD format. Finally, the candidates will develop an enhanced understanding of the concept of academic integrity and the ethics of scientific writing. The candidates will be able to overcome anxiety about academic publishing and get their research papers published in international journals....

최상위 리뷰


May 01, 2020

The course contents were precise, simple to follow, and clear to understand. Dr. Elena Bazanova's presentation is also good.\n\nI thank everyone who made this interesting course.


Dec 16, 2016

Will definately watch the videos and use the materials over an over again\n\nThe best academic writing course that I've taken since I started to study abroad in 2013

필터링 기준:

Scholarly Communication의 56개 리뷰 중 26~50

교육 기관: Sandeep S

Jan 02, 2016

one of the best courses, i have taken. very informative

교육 기관: María L G

Jun 16, 2017

Excelente curso, las explicaciones fueron muy claras.

교육 기관: Simon

Jan 12, 2016

Brilliant and must see course for every researcher.

교육 기관: Mehta N D

Jun 10, 2020

It is great learning experience during the course.

교육 기관: Pier P

Jun 17, 2016

Fantastic! It was really useful. Thank you

교육 기관: IGNACIO F R

Apr 06, 2020

Very practical course, I recommend it.

교육 기관: Abdul A

Feb 08, 2016

One of the best course for researhers

교육 기관: Bart S

Apr 25, 2016

Great introduction: do it again!

교육 기관: Francois X H

Mar 31, 2020

it was a constructive course

교육 기관: Artur K

Jun 12, 2017

Very clear and informative.

교육 기관: Taras P

May 20, 2016

Просто отличный курс!

교육 기관: Chaitali Y

Mar 20, 2020

Very informative.

교육 기관: subhash k

Jun 19, 2017

Brilliant course

교육 기관: Vivian N M

Apr 03, 2020

Nice. All good!

교육 기관: Aditi G

Mar 17, 2020

Very helpful

교육 기관: Karan G

Mar 17, 2020

good good

교육 기관: Pysarenko D

Jul 29, 2019

The theoretical part of the Course is great. I also liked the peer-grading assignments we had. However, the Practice Quiz part requires improvements: sometimes it's difficult to make an input as the field size for the text does not correspond the length of the text required. What is more, there are some questions in quizzes that do not have a specific answer, however, it is not possible to answer them as the publisher locked a concrete answer and whatever you write there (even if it is a correct statement) it is marked as incorrect.

교육 기관: Богер А

May 17, 2019

Очень много полезного узнал. Однако есть масса технических недоработок. При ответе на вопрос с текстом, где нужно записать ответ самому, кажется, что там только один правильный вариант. Но ведь это не так, их много. Или при перечислении (тоже печатный ответ) важно соблюсти порядок. Иначе система не принимает ответ.

교육 기관: Adara

Feb 26, 2018

It's a course full of good advice. However, the content of the last 2 weeks is too general and don't provide all that many examples. It is a recommendable course if you want to improve your writing in order to increase the chances of publishing a scientific article.

교육 기관: CARLA J F

May 23, 2019

Thank you, professor Elena, for all the knowledge shared with us, your students. I have learned a lot from your classes!

교육 기관: Madhusudanan.S

May 26, 2016

Gives the nuances of writing and also presents the logic of academic writing.

교육 기관: Mohamed S E

Sep 05, 2016

the lecturer need to develop his way of communications with students

교육 기관: Darrel C

Jan 31, 2016

Lots of essential information for budding researchers.

교육 기관: Keenan D M

Mar 23, 2016

The course provides a number of very useful tips for researchers, especially those whose first language is not English. There are a number of useful guides for new researchers to learn how to structure, phrase, and approach academic writing. However, there are also a few shortcomings of the course. Some of the material is overly subjective (giving rules for academic writing that are not necessarily applicable). Many of the assessment questions ask about issues which are either overly specific or simply incorrect (this is a very small percentage, but it is noticeable). The pace of the videos is also slow and oddly punctuated to the point that it can be difficult to follow at times. Finally, the course relies too heavily on academic writing for the hard sciences, rather than taking a broader approach, so some students may wish to keep this in mind when watching, as some advice may not be applicable to their own discipline.

Overall, a recommended course for ESL academics, but could do with some improvement.

교육 기관: Andrew B

Jun 13, 2016

It's good for undergraduates, and people returning to academia (say, before starting a Master's course). It's a very short simple introduction. I kind of wish it had more examples of language to use in academic writing, contrasting good and bad examples.

Some of the quiz questions and final exam questions need some proofreading. The videos from about week 3 to 4 have poor sound quality, but still understandable.