Aug 17, 2017
Very challenging , kind of forgetting my college statistics
대학: Kent Stevenson•
Apr 02, 2019
Had to go to outside sources (YouTube) for better explanations. The presenter seems disinterested and is reading (poorly) a script. Week 3 and 4 in particular had very few examples and it seems a mistake in the rubric for one of the Peer Reviewed Assignments.
대학: Khayala Jalilzade•
Feb 12, 2019
To be honest I didn't like this course. I cannot find answers to my questions. Tutor can not explain some lessons clearly.
대학: Krzysztof Ciesla•
Dec 13, 2018
I really liked this course. It combined a light-level, refresher course with building strong foundations for further development. It made key principles very clear and it backed theory with useful examples. Although my work duties made my completion delayed by nearly 5 months, I could easily return to the material and finish the course hassle free. This means that I appreciate both, the quality of the material taught and the flexible nature of the learning offered.
대학: Bernard De Villepin•
Nov 02, 2018
A good course about statistics. Quite difficult to be honest and I felt sometimes a lack of strong explanations (specially week 3).
대학: Tianyu Wang•
Oct 28, 2018
the classes performed by the female teacher are hard to understand both in her accent and content.
대학: 高鑫禄 (GAO, Xinlu)•
Oct 16, 2018
with some errors
Jul 25, 2018
The explanation was really poor, no examples
i had to check another websites and videos to be able to resolve the assignment
대학: Will Clavel•
Jul 08, 2018
boring videos: just waiting after somebody reading some prepared notes behind the camera........mistake on the last exam: its answer is not the one indicated by the prof -calculation error on (q1)..........some students explain way better each concept in the discussion threads than the prof herself, which is not normal ; furthermore, the King's College prof in charge of it, entirely delegated to some of his doctoral student: that does not work and reduce the user experience since irritating the student expectations.........please find a way to better expose the mathematical concepts: letting a doctoral student reading cards behind the camera (even being super kind) does not help that much: see how KhanAcademy does with such processes, using screencast underscoring the equations, formulations, stat', etc. Way easier to understand from their platform...........the title of the course is not very accurate: there are probability theories explained too, not just statistics (think about a student taking only this very course for performing in stat', why would he want to see proba' too; course title to be reviewed then)........which is very rare in Coursera: the exams are here are not very well linked to courses: sometimes we need to just check on another platform/source for finding the information corresponding so ======> in abstract: course absolutely needing to be revamped
대학: Alberto Matthei•
Jun 10, 2018
Statistics is a rather dry subject but it can be made interesting if you combine the lectures with good examples and exercises. That is definitely not the case in this course. There are a couple of videos with exercises which are quite good, but all the others are basically reading a statistic book.
Apr 04, 2018
Very bad quality, there are a lot of spelling errors across the assignments and tests. Furthermore, you have no possibility to finish the course just with the content provided, almost no examples but examination which requires knowledge not covered in the course.