The purpose of this course is to help individuals and organizations survive when confronted with disruptive technologies that threaten their current way of life. We will look at a general model of survival and use it to analyze companies and industries that have failed or are close to failing. Examples of companies that have not survived include Kodak, a firm over 100 years old, Blockbuster and Borders. It is likely that each of us has done business with all of these firms, and today Kodak and Blockbuster are in bankruptcy and Borders has been liquidated. Disruptions are impacting industries like education; Coursera and others offering these massive open online courses are a challenge for Universities. In addition to firms that have failed, we will look at some that have survived and are doing well. What are their strategies for survival?
제공자:
Surviving Disruptive Technologies (On Demand)
메릴랜드 대학교 칼리지파크 캠퍼스이 강좌에 대하여
제공자:
메릴랜드 대학교 칼리지파크 캠퍼스
The University of Maryland is the state's flagship university and one of the nation's preeminent public research universities. A global leader in research, entrepreneurship and innovation, the university is home to more than 37,000 students, 9,000 faculty and staff, and 250 academic programs. Its faculty includes three Nobel laureates, three Pulitzer Prize winners, 47 members of the national academies and scores of Fulbright scholars. The institution has a $1.8 billion operating budget, secures $500 million annually in external research funding and recently completed a $1 billion fundraising campaign.
강의 계획표 - 이 강좌에서 배울 내용
1.1
A Model and framework to help understand disruptive technologies
1.2
Some examples of companies that were not able to survive disruptive technologies
2.1
A company that did not survive and its disruptor
2.2
Another story of disruption and a summary of our examples
3.1
Newspapers are an important component of a democratic society; the Internet threatens them in a number of ways
3.2
Social media has transformed the way people relate to each other, but it has a disruptive component that is worrying
4.1
Two companies in this module are private and are very successful; a quasi-public agency has a hard time competing with them and their technology
13
Conclusions about disruption
14
Suggestions for how to respond to a disruptive technology
15
Survival in the physical world
검토
- 5 stars77.77%
- 4 stars16.66%
- 3 stars1.85%
- 2 stars1.85%
- 1 star1.85%
SURVIVING DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES (ON DEMAND)의 최상위 리뷰
Thank you for this course make me understand disruption technology and how to survive.
Thanks for offering this course as MOOC on Cursera.
Very cool to have failures as the focal point for case studies.
Very nicely constructed and informative course with apt examples
자주 묻는 질문
강의 및 과제를 언제 이용할 수 있게 되나요?
이 수료증을 구매하면 무엇을 이용할 수 있나요?
재정 지원을 받을 수 있나요?
궁금한 점이 더 있으신가요? 학습자 도움말 센터를 방문해 보세요.
