I really enjoyed this course because it was a good balance between the lectures and assignments. Doing the assignments not only helped me increase my confidence but also helped me expand my thinking.
Fantastic course. I really enjoyed the interviews with industry experts. They were extremely insightful. The exercises and assignments were super useful and the templates made it easy to get started.
교육 기관: Shiben N•
Genuinely helpful. Exercises at the end drive the concept thoroughly.
교육 기관: Nataliia L•
Great course if you want to start your career as a product manager.
교육 기관: Leonardo T•
An great courses wit real-world examples and very useful lectures
교육 기관: Elizaveta K•
Well structured course with many practical hand-on assignments
교육 기관: Ahmet Ö•
Thanks Nancy, it was a very inspiring and informative course.
교육 기관: Dewandio Y I•
This course so insightful. Can't wait to learn next course!
교육 기관: Monika F•
The course material was very useful and highly relevant.
교육 기관: Yash M•
Great course! Really loved the way it is structured.
교육 기관: Francesca P•
So helpful in understanding and applying concepts
교육 기관: Deniz•
Excellent content and great didactic approach!
교육 기관: PAVANI B R•
Every product manager must take this course!!
교육 기관: Zoriana S•
Very good materials with practical examples.
교육 기관: Polina G•
Great course! Looking forward to learn more.
교육 기관: Natasha K•
Good course. Lots of practice exercises.
교육 기관: 洪婉瑜•
Clear instruction and good framework.
교육 기관: Olivia T•
The course has been very beneficial.
교육 기관: Anil S•
Really Great Course!!
교육 기관: Hiep N•
it's great design
교육 기관: Debora C J S•
the best course
교육 기관: Abhijeet G•
교육 기관: maria•
교육 기관: Bruno H•
Well, I have mixed feelings about this course. In general, this is certainly a course that I would recommend to anyone interested in knowing about and becoming a PM. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that the instructor and the staff don't know about learning design. The course has a good mix of theoretical, real-world examples, and practice - that was really good! The real-world examples were well chosen and pertinent to the topic in the question. They were great, and I would state the instructor definitely went to the last mile with detailed examples instead of high-level ones usually found in courses (for example, on the Blue vs. Samson competitive analysis). Also, the exercises demand students to be really active, with the correct dose of challenge. Finally, the weakest point lies in the theoretical content, where almost 100% of them were taught while showing the instructor in front of the camera, without any supplementary material which would help students to have a visual representation and would help to follow the explanation (some simple bullet points would make the difference to follow along). I have learned a lot, from the PM-world terms and definitions, common traps, the role, the tools, the skills. Also, I had some insights along the way. As I mentioned, the learning design is not good, but the content is so valuable that this problem was surpassed (although it can certainly be improved).
교육 기관: Syed M M G•
I loved the content and direction. I would give it a 4.5 stars out of 5. The only think that it lacked was that I felt it was a little to brief forexample, PRDs (you could have added the different types and detail of PRD to show when to use which in what context), Competitive Analysis Doc (provide some proper case study that you had done prior to this instead of a brief summary which would have allowed everyone to understand in greater detail with more examples of each section), similarly all the other topics could have provided an actual example instead of a hypothetical example with a lot of brevity and simplicity. Showing actual real work detailed examples instead of smaller examples could improve the course immensely. Thank you for reading this. Also since I would have completed the entire courses and so I wont be able to view any changes that you make to this course afterwards, I was also hoping that any changes you make eg to temples and examples please could you open those for the Alumnis who have completed this course. Thank you in Advance! Have a nice day! Regards, Syed Gardezi
교육 기관: D K•
=== Material ===
Good material, on a fairly introductory level, though. I hope there will be more in-depth information in the part 2 of this course. Part of this was already familiar to me (coming from a UX background).
Next to the frameworks and tools I would also like to hear how to do them well. For example, in the competitive analysis framework - what to look for when identifying the 'how to win'. That is, of course, a separate topic worth hours of material, but some tips would be nice. Or extra reading, perhaps?
=== Choice of case study ===
I feel I would have benefited from a real case from my clients, but the peer-reviewed part makes it impossible for me. I am not allowed to just share information on the client work that I do, so I had to come up with an imaginary product.
I got stuck on it for quite a bit, it became an existential struggle :) Coming up with an imaginary product to work on was pretty hard for me.
=== General ===
Overall, decent course. Looking forward to part 2! This is a great initiative, thank you a lot!
교육 기관: Brenna S•
Nancy is great and is clearly knowledgeable and passionate about product management, which is exactly what you want in an instructor when learning a new topic for yourself. I learned a lot, but still left with a few questions unanswered. For example, at what point do each of the tasks reviewed come into play? It would be great to know, for example, if an incoming new PM is often expected to create a new competitive analysis, or is that usually grandfathered in? Are you creating a new competitive analysis with each new product, or feature? The customer personas seem loosely defined and not based on market data that has been gathered from vetted demographic information, yet some answers to the quizzes are suspiciously specific. It was never clear if you just make educated guesses on the demographics and stick to it, or if the information is actually coming from a reputable source. Perhaps these questions will be answered in the next installments of this specialization, but only time will tell!