Sep 07, 2019
Understanding the types of conflict will allow for clearer directions on resolution to said conflicts. Understanding that conflict can allow growth of a team is helpful in one's everyday business.
Sep 25, 2016
This course was fun and fits into real world experiences. I was able to use common sense along with the course material. Nalja speaks very clear and easy to follow.
교육 기관: Cheri P•
May 12, 2018
Good introduction to the topic.
교육 기관: Marcus C•
Sep 20, 2016
교육 기관: Daniel M•
Nov 14, 2016
I definitely would recommend more essential books and maybe TED Talks as well.
Great books on communication were written by William Ury
Getting to Yes
Getting to Yes with yourself (essential book)
교육 기관: Viktoriia S•
Aug 18, 2017
Hard language, some teachers are talking too quickly and hard to understand what they are saying. Not good structure of lessons. I would add lectures to read after videos, to make it more understandable. And also some some test to add. I didn't have this problem with UCI course Project Management which I liked a lot.
교육 기관: Christian B•
Aug 14, 2019
The course material its self is fine, if not useful. The major hurdle of the course was waiting for other individuals to submit coursework since peer-review is required for completion of the course.
교육 기관: Michael R•
Jun 04, 2016
Platitudes and generalizations. The interviews with real people are the only redeeming factor. I wasn't impressed.
교육 기관: Zuzana V•
May 21, 2016
The format of the course is not very engaging. The instructor shows slides with generic statements and then reads them slowly. The case studies are quite artificial and the answers are too obvious. I was expecting more tricks how to apply this in practice.
교육 기관: José P F P•
Aug 23, 2016
Interesting, bit not worthy of the invested money.
교육 기관: Jennifer D•
Feb 14, 2016
I didn't learn a whole lot -perhaps it is because I'm not coming into a professional setting as a newbie anymore? I found a lot of the examples juvenile - 'wearing a robe to the office' or 'stealing things'. I was looking for more substantial examples of idealogical conflict I guess -stuff that is harder to resolve than being a person of integrity and making good decisions. I know this is just module 1, but the content didn't feel valuable for the most part. The assignments were alright.
교육 기관: Jennifer P•
Mar 18, 2018
Very basic information. I was looking for more thorough investigation into conflict management. Thanks
교육 기관: Willa S•
Sep 04, 2018
Unfortunately, this course has not been useful for me for several reasons. It was not explicit that the conflict resolution was specifically referring to workplace conflict, as opposed to conflict in general. Additionally, the information was self-explanatory and the questions had obvious answers that could have been made without reviewing the lesson. Overall, I regret signing up for this course.
교육 기관: Anil P•
Apr 26, 2017
I want to bring it to Coursera's attention that this specialization on Conflict Management is poor quality, poor value and hardly any content. Week 1 is only a welcome lecture!! It is a 3-4 week course stretched out to 3 months so that students can be charged money $$$.
It should not be a paid specialization. It does not meet Coursera's high standards. Can you please forward this review to the right person?
교육 기관: Alexandra•
Jan 29, 2016
Not very interesting or well-presented.
교육 기관: Daria S•
Dec 22, 2017
Very poorly presented. You can hear pages turning and sometimes see presenter read the texts. Since there obviously is a script, it could at least be made available.
교육 기관: Birk M•
Jan 21, 2016
This is a joke right?
5 minutes long videos with questions after it shall teach me effective?!
you guys are ridiculous!
교육 기관: Dr. D S•
Jul 30, 2017
교육 기관: Jeremy S•
Apr 27, 2019
Requirement for peer reviews and lack of people actively taking the course seems to limit how fast you can actually do this course. The instruction lacked real emphasis on the important terms to pay attention to, leaving you rewatching videos and searching the transcript only to leave you googling the concepts and feeling confused anyways. At the end of the day, the peer reviews should have been multiple choice, as they were effectively asking you for one dimensional concepts. I don't feel I walked away with any additional information.