Chevron Left
Agile Meets Design Thinking(으)로 돌아가기

버지니아 대학교의 Agile Meets Design Thinking 학습자 리뷰 및 피드백

4.7
1,467개의 평가
386개의 리뷰

강좌 소개

Despite everyone's good intentions, hard work and solid ideas, too many teams end up creating products that no one wants, no one can use, and no one buys. But it doesn't have to be this way. Agile and design thinking offer a different--and effective--approach to product development, one that results in valuable solutions to meaningful problems. In this course, you’ll learn how to determine what's valuable to a user early in the process--to frontload value--by focusing your team on testable narratives about the user and creating a strong shared perspective. As a Project Management Institute (PMI®) Registered Education Provider, the University of Virginia Darden School of Business has been approved by PMI to issue 25 professional development units (PDUs) for this course, which focuses on core competencies recognized by PMI. (Provider #2122) This course is supported by the Batten Institute at UVA’s Darden School of Business. The Batten Institute’s mission is to improve the world through entrepreneurship and innovation: www.batteninstitute.org....

최상위 리뷰

OT

Feb 24, 2017

This course was an excellent introduction to Agile, particularly for a 'newbie'. Having heard about Agile I've been interested in learning more and found this course to be exactly what I needed.

GN

Jan 16, 2020

It's a great overview of what can be achieved with putting agile into the center of discussion and why is it important, and also how to achieve those goals which are set out in a practical way.

필터링 기준:

Agile Meets Design Thinking의 375개 리뷰 중 351~375

교육 기관: Boon-Kin L

Dec 04, 2019

Great course Very well presented. I enjoyed. Thanks

교육 기관: Sharon d B

Mar 26, 2017

Interesting, insightful, well explained, practical.

교육 기관: SWAPNIL M V

Apr 05, 2018

Could be more elaborative and practical oriented.

교육 기관: Konstantin K

Aug 28, 2018

Quite useful but too many words

교육 기관: Arun K

Dec 10, 2019

great program to learn agile

교육 기관: Ritabha

Apr 13, 2018

Very well explained!!

교육 기관: Vamsi K R

Jan 06, 2020

Sometimes video lags

교육 기관: Danish R

Jul 22, 2019

helpful content

교육 기관: Elton d S M

Oct 28, 2016

So far so good!

교육 기관: Gerjon Z

Jan 17, 2017

excellent.

교육 기관: Sachin B

Jan 08, 2020

Good

교육 기관: Dhiraj K

Aug 27, 2019

Good

교육 기관: Pommiraj A

Feb 18, 2019

G

교육 기관: Shahria A K

Jul 01, 2018

More practical examples would have made this course more appealing to me. HVAC in a Hurry I thought was a very complicated example for general students. It could have been a lot easier if provided with an easier example. Overall, good experience but not great :(

교육 기관: JIng Z

Feb 06, 2020

Class design are not the best , some video are very long ,and the instructor speaks in a very plain ,long-sentence,dry way to lose interests very easily .

교육 기관: PETER B

Mar 19, 2018

Developing personas part of the course was very helpful. There was a ton of material in the course, and can't help but think it could be streamlined.

교육 기관: Sharath C

May 22, 2016

While the content and the curriculum of the course is ok, the course is not moderated enough in terms of answering the questions the participants have

교육 기관: Rawan R

Dec 09, 2018

I take effort to understand the and keep in track with the instructor, but it's a good content

교육 기관: Amaresh K P

Dec 26, 2019

Not of much relevant for people who already know little agile.

교육 기관: Manuel d P

Feb 20, 2017

Longer than it should be

교육 기관: Harold J

Mar 07, 2016

Underway

교육 기관: Marshall S

Jun 27, 2019

instructional and good interface of skills by creating personas and user stories but some of curriculum was repetitive and predicated on venture design and not necessarily how agile and design thinking intertwine

교육 기관: Ico R R

Apr 01, 2016

Classes are ok, but there is no support at all, no advisors to answer your questions, even if you pay for the course.

교육 기관: Eva P R H

Jan 08, 2020

I expected more about Design Thinking

교육 기관: Paulo M M

Jun 04, 2017

the evaluation is a shit.