전체 Coursera 둘러보기

For Enterprise

Join for Free
Log In

예술 & 인문학
비즈니스
컴퓨터 공학
데이터 과학
정보 기술
건강
수학 및 논리
자기개발
물리 과학 및 공학
사회 과학
언어 학습
학위
수료증

전체 Coursera 둘러보기

검색
포 엔터프라이즈 (For Enterprise)
로그인
무료 회원 가입

Lecture 4A: Inheritance

Loading...

Major Depression in the Population: A Public Health Approach

존스홉킨스대학교

4.6(156개의 평가) | 13K명의 학생이 등록함

Public Mental Health is the application of the principles of medicine and social science to prevent the occurrence of mental and behavioral disorders and to promote mental health of the population. This course illustrates the principles of public health applied to depressive disorder, including principles of epidemiology, transcultural psychiatry, health services research, and prevention. It is predicted that by 2020 depressive disorder will be the most important cause of disease burden in the entire world! Every human being suffers from feeling depressed at some point or other, but only about one fifth of the population will experience an episode of depressive disorder over the course of their lives. This course illuminates the public health approach to disease, and the particular complexities of applying this approach to mental disorders, using depression as the exemplar.

강의 계획서 보기

검토

4.6(156개의 평가)

5 stars
116 ratings
4 stars
29 ratings
3 stars
7 ratings
2 stars
3 ratings
1 star
1 ratings

CM

Dec 13, 2018

Great course ! I learned information that i never knew existed.

DW

Apr 06, 2018

Very interesting course. Good structure and presentation, too.

수업에서

The Search for Etiologic Clues

This week the focus is on possible causes for depressive disorder, including inheritance, stress, social life, work life, and the evolution of modern living.

Lecture 4A: Inheritance9:28

Lecture 4B: Stress & Diathesis7:35

Lecture 4C: Social Supports5:37

Lecture 4D: Work, Family, and Life Stage7:39

Lecture 4E: Recency of Birth20:42

강사:

William Eaton, PhD
Professor, Mental Health
Wietse A. Tol, PhD
Ali & Rose Kawi Assistant Professor, Mental Health
Ramin Mojtabai, MD
Associate Professor, Mental Health

스크립트

Hello folks its Bill Eaton and this is

Major Depression in the Population, the Public Health approach.

And we're in lecture 4 entitled The Search for Etiologic Clues.

So this is the outline of the presentation today.

And it's about risk factors.

So, prior lecture we studied about research designs

and a little bit on methods and psychiatric epidemiology.

But now we're going to use those methods, and

try to understand what is it

that increases the risk for depressive disorder?

And you can see we're going to consider

inheritance, and stress, social supports, and work life.

And then this funny combination of socioeconomic status and

social supports and life stage, I'll tell you about that.

And then a recency of birth as risk factors for depressive disorder.

So the first section on inheritance.

Now you remember in the first lecture, I

talked a little bit about Alfred Lord Tennyson, and

showed you his family tree which was darkly

colored with people with depressive disorder of different types.

And so now I'm just going to show you a tiny bit more on depressive disorder.

This is a slide on family studies of depressive disorder.

And you can see, you know, we have this cases and controls language here.

So we have cases of depressive disorder, and controls

who are like them except they don't have depressive disorder.

And then, we're going to study in their first degree

relatives the prevalence of depressive disorder in cases and controls.

And this is a selection, there are a couple dozen studies

in table 8.3 in Peter Zandi's Chapter in Public Mental Health.

This is a selection of four of those that I chose.

These are some

of the strongest studies.

And you can see that this literature is a little bit old.

We aren't doing that many family studies on depressive disorder

anymore because we, we know the results, to some extent.

So we have in Gershon's study we have 133 cases.

And in their first degree relatives, first degree

relatives are siblings, or parents, or children, right?

And these first degree relatives share 50% of their genetic material

with the case.

So there's 17%, 16.6% in the case, but only 5.8% in the controls.

And you get a similar preponderance in Winokur's study.

11.2 of prevalence of depressive disorder in their first degree relative

of cases, versus 7.3 in the first degree relatives of controls.

So this is a little bit repetitive, 14.9 versus 5.6.

So, and 19 versus 7.7 in Heun and Maier study.

What this shows us is, that we think that depressive disorder is inherited.

Now it could be, that it's inherited through cultural patterns and upbringing.

But basically we tend to think that it's actually

in the genetic material that is making it be inherited.

There's a little more evidence here, on twin studies.

We have monozygotic twins, MZ pairs.

Those twins are formed from the same egg and

sperm, so they share 100% of their genetic material.

And dizygotic pairs are twins in the same birth process,

but they are like siblings sharing 50% of their genetic material.

So we have again, I've selected 4 studies from Peter

Zandi's fourth table in Chapter 8 in Public Mental Health.

And if you look at the first one by McGuffin, there's 84 monozygotic pairs.

Of course,

it's hard to find these.

These are hard to conduct studies because you have to find

those twin pairs, and McGuffin got them from a hospital population.

And there are 130 dizygotic pairs.

And concordance means if the one twin has the

disorder, what percentage of the other twin has it?

So you can see the monozygotic pairs, if one

twin has it, 53% of the other twin has it.

For the dizygotic twin pairs, if one twin has it,

28% of the other twin will have it.

So its much stronger for the monozygotic,

and that makes us think that its inherited.

And we actually can calculate a so called heritability estimate.

And this is the estimate of the total variance in

the population, what percentage of that is so called genetic variance?

And 43% is a sizable chunk of the variance.

And I've listed in the column called population, different sources of data.

And this

turns out to be one of the important things

in the, research on depression where the data come from.

People with depressive disorder in the hospital are different than people from

the general population with depressive disorder

as in Kendler's study at the bottom.

And likewise, they're different from the

Veteran's Twin Registry, and from volunteers.

But you can see for example, in Mike Lyon's work

on the Veteran's Twin Registry, the monozygotic versus dizygotic is 22

versus 14 with a heritability of 36%.

And Laura Bierut's larger population, and she's categorized them as

to same sex dizygotic pairs, or opposite sex dizygotic pairs.

Monozygotic pairs are always the same sex because

they have the 100% of the genetic material shared.

But dizygotic pairs can have different sex.

And she's also tabulated by sex, and you can see there that the females have higher

rate of depressive disorder than the males.

For example, in the monozygotic twins it's 38 versus 20.

That tends to be the tendency.

Females have more depressive disorder than males in

general, and she gets a heritability of about 44%.

Likewise, Ken Kendler with a general population of twins, is called the

Virginia Twin Registry, which he formed and has been working on, 38% heritability.

So this

makes us think look, depression in inherited.

And I think nobody would challenge that.

The next step is, let's find a gene that's connected to the depressive disorder.

Or maybe two genes or three genes.

For example, a study of phenylketonuria, there is a single gene.

A single location on the genome which is related to phenylketonuria.

But we have been searching for that gene, or those genes for decades.

And this is the most recent search that I have.

It's called a mega analysis, because they

looked at 1.2 million single nucleo type polymorphisms.

Those are locations on the chromosome

single pieces of chemicals on the chromosome.

And he had 18,759 subjects, right?

So if anything could find it, you'd think this could find it.

But you see the second red underlining there.

No SNIPs, that's a single

nucleotide polymorphism or like in an

allele, no SNIP achieved genome-wide significance.

And so where the arrows are, although

this is the largest genome-wide analysis of major

depressive disorder yet conducted, its high prevalence

means that the sample is still under powered.

So the geneticists are asking for more than 20,000 people,

and more money from the taxpayer to search for these genes.

And this is referred to as the missing

heritability, this paradox we have.

We know it's inherited, but we can't find the genes.

This is another just example of what

happened to the heritability of depressive disorder.

When they do a genome-wide scan, that is, they look at, let's

say, a million different positions on the chromosome, the 23 chromosome's there.

And you can see chromosome 1, 2, 3, on the x axis there.

And they plot of all the locations, the significance

of the relationship to the phenotype of interest.

In this case its height, that is how tall is somebody?

Everybody knows that you have tall parents, you have tall kids,

short parents short kids, tall father, short mother, medium height kids.

Inheritance is inherited, and when you do a genome wide association study, you

get something like this, which is called a Manhattan plot, looks like sky scrapers.

And if you pay close attention

to the left hand, the ordinate there, you can see that's the negative log ten.

That's the significance value.

And when the significance value is 20 there, that

means basically there are 19 zeros after the decimal point.

Stating basically, that the finding would occur by chance if

it's at that level, 1 in 10 to the 20th times.

It's completely impossible to have occured by chance.

The value of 8 I've marked down there, is about one in a hundred million.

So you can see in this Manhattan plot on chromosome 1, and chromosome 3, and

chromosome 6 and 7 and 8 and 12 and 13 and 20, there are hugely important findings.

And so this Manhattan plot as we say, it looks like Manhattan.

Now let's make a Manhattan plot for depressive disorder.

And there's the value of 8.

We have to change the scale, but

this Manhattan plot does not look like Manhattan.

There's nothing in there.

It looks like Ames, Iowa.

I hope the people from the Midwest won't think I'm prejudice.

I think Ames doesn't have very many tall buildings in it.

It's been a long time since I've been there.

But this is the other issue.

We, we, we're almost certain that depression is

inherited, but we can't find exactly how its inherited.

It's very complicated.

Either its lots of different genes acting together, or the genes act with

the environment in very complex ways, or

they interact together in very complex ways.

Still a puzzle. So that's our issue about inheritance.

I, I'm sorry we can't come to better conclusion.

Just think back to Alfred Lord Tennyson, and the density of his family tree.

And now we'll move on to the second most important aspect

of depressive disorder, that we also considered

in our first lecture, that is stress.

Coursera 카탈로그 살펴보기

무료로 참여해 맞춤화된 추천, 업데이트 및 제안을 받아보세요.

Coursera는 세계 최고의 교육에 대한 보편적인 접근 기회를 제공하며, 최고의 대학 및 기관들과 제휴하여 온라인 강좌를 제공합니다.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. All rights reserved.

앱스토어에서 다운로드하기

구글 플레이에서 받기

Coursera
소개
리더십
직업
카탈로그
수료증
MasterTrack™ 수료증
학위
포 엔터프라이즈 (For Enterprise)
정부용

커뮤니티
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

연결
블로그
Facebook
Linkedin
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
기술 블로그

기타
조건
개인정보 보호
도움말
접근성
보도 자료
문의하기
디렉토리
계열사