EN
Jan 17, 2021
I really enjoyed this course, it was very informative and easy to follow. The videos were clear and the graded sections were great. The course as a whole was enjoyable and would recommend to others.
AF
Mar 1, 2016
SO INTERESTING AND FUN. Have you ever took a stranger'S secret and propose another stranger to take that secret in exchange of one of his? This course is an opportunity to do crazy stuff like that!
By I P S A W
•Sep 15, 2020
nice
By Mona A A
•Sep 2, 2020
good
By Jainam J
•Jul 27, 2020
good
By JAYESH S M
•Jun 27, 2020
nice
By UMAMAHESWARI D
•Jun 24, 2020
good
By Kalaiselvi K
•Jun 20, 2020
Good
By T. A
•Jun 20, 2020
good
By ALOKE R B
•Jun 20, 2020
good
By Vajinepalli s s
•Jun 13, 2020
nice
By JEEVANANDHAN E
•Jun 10, 2020
Good
By Sekar V
•Jun 9, 2020
good
By Soumya S
•May 26, 2020
Good
By Paheli P
•May 23, 2020
good
By Kiran D
•Apr 22, 2020
Good
By Rajiv D
•Aug 21, 2017
Good
By SYLLA Y
•Jan 21, 2024
bon
By Kawaljit S K
•Sep 26, 2022
na
By Shubham S
•May 31, 2020
gud
By LOKESH K
•Mar 7, 2022
OP
By GAURAV V
•May 31, 2020
na
By Ahood A
•Jul 29, 2023
-
By M A R
•Apr 26, 2022
g
By Nguyen T
•Apr 27, 2020
i
By DIna M
•Apr 17, 2016
E
By Joel E
•Apr 7, 2023
The content of the course is excellent. It's consonant with what I've learned about creativity and problem solving elsewhere. The course was well constructed, with thought provoking exercises that are well designed to cultivate divergent thinking, which is an essential component of creative problem solving. The only complaint I have is that there were a huge number of garbage submissions when it came time for peer assignment evaluations. You're supposed to grade 4 other assignments, and this is great. However the majority of submissions that I saw were gibberish or obvious copy/paste nonsense. I'm not talking about poorly done but serious attempts at completing the assignments. But many were just people going qwepoirupqoweirp on the keyboard. This was frustrating since you're supposed to evaluate the work of 4 other students. I imagine that there just aren't a large number of people taking the class at any given moment, so when you've evaluated all the 1 or 2 real assignments that are current, you just get total garbage assignments to fill out your 4. I didn't want to seriously evaluate assignments that were not even real attempts, so I flagged most of those as "incomplete" or in some cases "plagiarized" if they included content obviously grabbed from the Internet, like stock photos instead of original work. In most cases, these obviously garbage posts didn't even try to pretend to be relevant to the assignment. But there were such a high percentage of junk submissions that I had to find a few of them to grade 'seriously', even if I gave them zero points, just in order that I could complete evaluating 4 other submissions. This is obviously not the fault of the designers of the class, so if you are interested in Creative Problem Solving content rather than just going a;sliejrpq98wu4poaijs on the keyboard, I wouldn't let that dissuade you from taking the class. Hopefully it will be less jarring for you if you know about it ahead of time. I spent at least 40 minutes flagging junk submissions. I hope that Coursera will actually remove them. But the class is worthwhile even with the junk submissions.