BS
Jan 17, 2020
I am very thankful to you sir.. i have learned so much great things through this course.
this course is very helpful for my career. i would like to learn more courses from you. thank you so much.
VO
Sep 17, 2019
Good course, but the last of three was the most difficult one. I hope that it were a good introduction to the fascinating world of statistics and data science
By Sheng-Ta T
•Jan 24, 2021
Week 3 starts to get unreasonably difficult and hard to understand. Apart from that, the course is still worthwhile to take.
By Ezequiel P
•Oct 11, 2020
Great course. In my view, the lectures were too long and the assignments a bit easy. But, overall, great course.
By Antonio P
•Sep 7, 2020
I think the notebook walkthroughs, while useful, could use some extra reinforcement in the statistical concepts
By Iderval d S J S
•Nov 30, 2020
The course is great, but I would suggest that the subject of week 3 be divided into two weeks.
By Sunit K
•May 27, 2020
Great course. It really improved my understanding of statistical modeling methodologies.
By Santanu G
•Jul 22, 2021
Starting from basics of Statistical model to the depth its fine course.
By G.akhil
•Mar 6, 2020
team work
By sahil f
•Sep 17, 2020
None
By Sebastien d L
•Jun 1, 2020
The content of this course is very thorough, but unfortunately it does not make very good use of the online asynchronous nature of a platform like Coursera. Most of the course consists of lengthy video-lectures paging through slides (and occasionally walking through notebooks). The hands-on parts seem like a second thought, and are mostly made of either reading long Jupyter notebooks, or running simple pre-coded ones to answer a short quizz. Statistical modeling is a topic that shoudl naturally lend itself really well to a "learn by doing" method, but unfortunately this course took the more traditional academic approach (nothing wrong with the later, it's just less engaging for me, especially when sitting in front of a computer).
By Fabian d A G
•Sep 20, 2021
The final course was definitely a step up in terms of difficulty from the previous two courses. The assignments aren't that hard, but lot of the material are discussed without getting into depth, which makes it difficult to really get a good idea about the inner workings of the statisticsa methods used. I wish the course developers planned the specialization to be a 05 or 06 course specialization, so that the materials covered will be well spread and learners will be eased into the new concepts. Giving a low rating owing to the structure of the course.
By Anastasios B
•Dec 12, 2021
While the topics are interesting, like other courses in this specialization, this one does not really teach Python. Rather, it uses it as a tool in prepared notebooks that you can follow along with, but largely need to do your own research to understand the various syntax and variables used. This really is more of a Stats course, where the Python element doesn't add much other than some visuals of how to read results or view charts/plots using Python. It really isn't an integral part of the course material.
By CARLOS M V R
•Sep 13, 2020
I do not feel like this course had given me great knowledge, there is a lot of theory and almost none practice of python, specially in the last two weeks. Topics are interesting and they are good as an opener to learn statistics but there is not enough python about them. I am disappointed on this specialization (specially on this course), I only finished the course because it was the one left to complete the specialization.
By Mike W
•Dec 21, 2019
There is some good lecture content, but the assessments don't really give you a chance to "do stats" and demonstrate mastery of the material.
E.g., the week 3 Python assessment consists of just running Python code--you don't actually write any code--and answering the questions is as easy as, e.g., picking the parameter with the largest number.
By Xio L
•Feb 6, 2020
It feels like Brady is reading off the slides and squeezing in a lot of information in a 10-12 min talk. I would prefer the course slows down and would introduce a case example before jumping into models full blown. The slides look wordy. Circling out the numbers when they are mentioned in the talk would help students focus as well.
By Yaron K
•Jan 26, 2019
I had never given much thought to multilevel models and their implications (for example how clustering or the interviewer effected the results). So the course was definitely interesting. However the Python notebooks that are part of the course don't give enough detail to be able to apply the theoretic material to other models.
By Amirali K
•Aug 2, 2021
It needs more mathematics and theories in its content presentation to better understanding what happened in the python codes. Thank you for giving me a chance to pass this course to have an overview of statistical modeling.
By Nero
•Aug 5, 2022
It is good as an introduction / overview course, but barely touches any mathematics background in fitting models to data. The assignment is not challenging enough
By aurelien l
•May 23, 2020
I was a bit disappointed by the notebooks of week3: missing some details and explanations for me.
By Ersyida K
•Sep 18, 2019
please better explanation of python videos
By Mikel A
•May 31, 2020
In my opinion, the course does not worth. I just complete it, as I came from the first two courses and I wanted to complete all the specialization (and I still had some days untill the deadline of the fee).
The first week is very basic. Week two, could be the most usefull if they had develope the maths behind fitting, not just a conceptual explanation. And finally weeks three and four, in my opinion, are out of the level of the course; I can't understand why to move to multivelel or Bayesian, if the basic fitting of Week2 has not been explained. In all the course, just concepts are explained, not the maths to understand in detail.
Moreover, I found too many extern lectures, apps or interviews that add little to the course.
The quiz, as in the previous course should be re-thought, I don't think are the best evaluation method. As for example, you can have wrong answer just not for running the code in Jupyter Notebook but in Spyder. Moreover, the quiz from weeks 2 and 3 about Python are ridiculous, you just have to run a code already written by the teaching stuff.
By Ron M C
•Apr 30, 2020
Good job in covering the initial models, and then above average when going into the multi-level modeling, but pretty disappointed on the marginal and the bayesian. Bayesian videos started out well, but really felt superficial when it was all done. With all of the courses in this specialization, there is little to no actually learning of python, just some simple outputs -- really missed the mark in teaching us python to solve these problems.
By Esmail T
•Apr 28, 2024
It was irrelevant and contained unnecessary content. Why are we drowning in theoretical statistical topics instead of focusing on Python? Thus far, the course has been more about statistics than actually working with Python! I am here to address my statistical needs using Python, not to become an expert in statistics. Unfortunately, this course seems to be doing just the opposite.
By Ahmed A
•Jul 14, 2020
I was following this specialization since course 1, unfortunately, I only found course 1 easy to understand for someone like me with good background in computer science. However, course 2 and 3 were very hard to grasp. I would suggest to start each topic with a simple visualized example to explain and demonstrate the essence before delving into the math.
By Hernan D
•Aug 26, 2020
In my opinion, I think the course is not as good as the first two courses of the specialization. The explanation of the python libraries from week 3 and 4 are very poor and should be improved. However, the theoretical regression section is well explained and carried out.
By Bhanu P P
•Jun 28, 2020
The course made things even more complicated. The duration of the video being more than 10 mins is only frustrating and the quiz has noting to do with the concepts. The lectures are boring and rushed. Not to the mark