I thought it was a great intro coming from my Architecture background and looking forward to the other classes. I did think the information was occasionally repetitive but overall it had a great flow.
This was a great experience. It gave the confidence to tackle such issues as Duration of Activity Schedules and many more. Learned a lot and course content will forever be my guide on future projects.
교육 기관: Izzy•
교육 기관: ÀLEXANDRE V P•
교육 기관: GUILLERMO E O B•
교육 기관: Priyanka O•
교육 기관: Oussama B S•
교육 기관: vishwadeep K•
교육 기관: Andrea S•
even though the course brings a great scope on the project planning regarding construction, there is a lot of repeated and incongruent information through the multiple lessons given by different professors (such as surety bond topic, projects delivery methods, ect.). I would strongly recommend to review all the presentations and unify the concepts explained.
교육 기관: Jenifer H•
In week 5 it did not cover enough about Estimating but yet it had you complete a quiz completely on it which is horrible. Otherwise there is are quite a bit of useful information but quite a bit of monotone speakers which makes it hard top stay engaged.
교육 기관: Todor G•
The course was a bit too basic and some of the videos were too broad. Some had information which did not seem to contribute to the purpose of the course. Overall it is good course to listen over my free time and learn a few new things.
교육 기관: Jimmy H•
Course was theory based. Was hoping the course would provide more real life scenarios and examples. Week 5 provided some examples and math problems on determining formwork and duration of the project. Was hoping to see more of that.
교육 기관: Rick D•
I did not think the instructors were very engaging. For the most part they read from slide decks that were also on the screen. There should be more visuals and discussion about what it is like to work in construction management.
교육 기관: Francisco P G•
Varios conceptos básicos y otros que no tienen aplicación en países ajenos a los EEUU.
Donde me concentraría? Tipos de entrega, contratos y scheduling.
Donde NO me concentraría? Aspectos legales y surity bonds
교육 기관: Daniel V•
A little simplistic with just lectures and quizzes. Just scratches the surface of general knowledge. If assignments were added to the course and the lectures expanded the course would offer more value.
교육 기관: Quentin M•
Overall it's good. Depending on the customer's level of experience in construction. Some of the classes are very basic knowledge. But the structure of the course is consistent.
교육 기관: amr e•
i think it's a good course with many specialized people every one on it's field but that what prevent the course from being great some of them don't know how to teach
교육 기관: Hector M•
The sessions sometimes were too long for a subject that really didnt needed that amountof time. For example : Planning and scheduling
교육 기관: Taraka A S•
Good start with Fundamentals. Need to take more advanced courses to gain indepth knowledge.
교육 기관: Nick S•
The professor Ibrahim Odeh was good, but some other presenters have not been very well.
교육 기관: Bryce B•
This course provides very basic information, and I did not find it helpful.
교육 기관: Pradhuman B•
Should be more practical and software involved should be taught.
교육 기관: CHARLENE B•
CURRICULUM NOT APPLICABLE TO MY ROLE IN MY CURRENT EMPLOYMENT
교육 기관: Bader e Y•
교육 기관: Kamalsingh A•
교육 기관: George A•
I thought the class did a good job of generally introducing the world of Construction Mgmt and I learned a lot. Using lecturers from the field made the lectures more interesting, however, it was apparent that the lecturers weren't trained in education or how to present information clearly to a class of students who are learning this material for the first time. The guest lecturers all used basic PPT presentations that weren't very engaging most of the time. I took the Construction Scheduling class simultaneously and that class was far more involved and varied in the way the information was prevented since the professor was actually an educator by trade. On top of that the homework assignment instructions differed from the rubrics we had to use to grade them, so in both cases I had to resubmit my assignment only AFTER seeing the rubric. Overall the core information was interesting, but it was presented so poorly that it made the class feel like an endless stream of trivia facts, further meaning that I might forget most of this info in the near future.
교육 기관: Tim G•
I am a person with an accent myself and I am fully aware of the fact that one cannot help it but this being a virtually prerecorded course, it doesn't have to be done by people with severe accents. Actually an actor could have read the whole thing without an issue. The last week and the BIM week were absolutely insufferable. The material actually relating to Construction Project Management started last and the delivery was barely legible.