Mar 17, 2016
I liked the way the functions & tasks of information design were taught with a hands on approach. I recommend this for anybody keen to understand what information design is and how to make it work.
Jul 30, 2017
Fantastic. Very good teacher. I found it immensely useful to see him work through examples in real time. I feel this has been the best course I have done in a VERY long time. Highly recommended
대학: Giny Chin•
Apr 23, 2019
Very interesting course. Highly recommended. Hope to learn more in the remaining courses of this specialization.
대학: Santiago Borray•
Mar 15, 2019
Very useful design principles and exploration for the different form factors
대학: Jared Gillespie•
Feb 14, 2019
Great practice for wireframes and mock ups, but the tools are so out of date. I know tools are everything, but knowing current tools is on every single job posting out there so...
대학: Julia Saviuk•
Dec 06, 2018
The tasks in assignments of this course were very unclear.
Nov 01, 2018
대학: Hanna Trzeciak•
Aug 26, 2018
Unfortunately, I was disappointed with the content of the lessons/lectures - not enough information given, all too general, not concrete enough, therefor I had to learn most of the things on my own (in order to complete the homework).
Also, the instructions for the assignments were not clear enough in my opinion - no examples given for week 2 i 3.
대학: Elle Kieu Phuong Le•
Jun 29, 2018
I like the practical assignments a lot.
대학: Maria Kuzmenko•
Jun 21, 2018
One of the best courses in this specialization! Personally I sometimes need to be pushed to understand that you can do it. With each assignment, you start realizing that everything is possible and you can quickly come up with ideas both for desktop, mobile, watch, and wall interfaces. Thanks, professor Scott Klemmer for this course and the specialization!
대학: Stephanie B•
Apr 26, 2018
This course addresses key skills for UI design (wireframing and mock-ups), and with enough time and insight, the pieces could be portfolio-worthy. Unfortunately, unless you look ahead, you don’t realize in week 1 that whatever site you choose will be carried through the entire course. I happened to choose a rather boring wireframing subject, because it really needed a redesign, and ended up stuck with it for the entire course. And as Ben Fry says much too late in week 3, if you choose something you’re “personally curious about and invested in, it will show in the final outcome.”
The course is good overall, though my rating is a bit generous. My main issue is the conflicting way that the basic instruction is written in all of the assignments. The assignments say to mock-up the homepage and one other screen, while the submission criteria and grading rubric say two distinct key screens for two common tasks, or two screens for one task. If you follow the assignment and mock-up the homepage and one other page, you’re left describing tasks that you haven’t shown. I’m done with the course and still not totally sure on the intent here. Perhaps this could be edited for future sessions.
대학: Sam Donaldson•
Mar 28, 2018
I didn't feel like the content was that detailed - all seemed very high level/common sense.