Chevron Left
On Strategy : What Managers Can Learn from Philosophy - PART 1(으)로 돌아가기

센트랄 쉬펠레크 대학의 On Strategy : What Managers Can Learn from Philosophy - PART 1 학습자 리뷰 및 피드백

4.7
405개의 평가
131개의 리뷰

강좌 소개

In the expression “creative thinking”, the keyword is not creativity; the keyword is thinking. With the help of great philosophers, you will rediscover the art of thinking. To help leaders to be rigorous even without figures, great philosophers have lots of ideas. Managers are invited to rediscover the art of thinking. They should understand the role of mental models, realize the importance of cognitive bias, agree on clear definitions and efficient criteria etc. Creativity demands the ability to unshackle ourselves from conventional ways of thinking, to "think outside the box". But we need to go a step further. Once outside the box, we need to construct a new box or boxes (that is, new intellectual frameworks or models) to help us structure our thinking. Only once we have done so can we generate truly game-changing ideas....

최상위 리뷰

VI

Feb 28, 2017

Very engaging and I appreciate the style of Luc's lectures, catering to both left and right brained people. Really loved all of the lectures and would like to take one of his classes in person!

HK

Oct 06, 2019

I absolutely loved this course. It provides a toolkit to think about organisational strategy and can be useful for everyone working for an organisation, but especially for senior managers.

필터링 기준:

On Strategy : What Managers Can Learn from Philosophy - PART 1의 129개 리뷰 중 126~129

교육 기관: Jose R B

Nov 01, 2015

Very interesting

교육 기관: Martin P

Aug 14, 2015

The first few topics of the course were really insightful and valuable, but this trend didn't hold out for the whole course.

교육 기관: Francesco F

Jul 13, 2016

Some few interesting insights on epistemology, but nothing more

교육 기관: Devendra P

Jan 10, 2016

It started really well with the deduction and induction ... However, in the later part of the series the explanation and examples were very light and process of creating new models could have been detailed more