Oct 03, 2018
Superb course,\n\nI definitely understand Golang far better than I did when I originally started it!
Nov 15, 2018
A nice course which introduces necessary concepts in programming within Go.
대학: Justin Liu•
May 23, 2019
some homework questions are wrong
대학: Alec Julien•
May 21, 2019
I'll say again what I said regarding the first course in this series. The teacher is good, and the material is valuable, but the fact that students have to grade each others' work is ridiculous, and actually kind of angering, if I'm honest. Why would you trust me to grade someone else's work, while I'm learning it at the same time they are? Who knows? Maybe I'm an idiot. Even if I'm bright and hard-working, I won't have the same insight as an instructor would, looking at the same material. This is pedagogically difficult to justify, and I can only believe that it's meant to shield the instructor from the drudgery of the task.
대학: Terence Sambo•
May 19, 2019
There were a few inaccuracies which might be confusing for newcomers to the language. It would be good if the instructor or someone else with editing permissions could take a look at the feedback and act on it.
대학: Sylvain Tenier•
May 14, 2019
The topic is good, however the videos really have this old-school touch- you know, the very reason you choose to go to Coursera and not back to some class bench. Evaluations would also benefit from a good review, too much frustating inconsistencies for my (and many people on the forums) taste.
May 13, 2019
It's very nice.
대학: yichen zheng•
May 03, 2019
대학: Flavio Sales Truzzi•
Apr 22, 2019
The course is extremely basic, not very complete, and full of errors that are being dragged through multiple months, the errors have been flagged on the forums, and they are never fixed. The grading is made by peer review - which could be a good thing, but the rubric for grading are could be completely automated, and it isn't.
대학: Serge Toropov•
Mar 25, 2019
quite a lot of mistakes in study materials and tests
대학: Yuheng Chen•
Mar 21, 2019
A little more typos on the slides ...
대학: Edward Hsu•
Mar 20, 2019
The programming assignment workload is reasonable, but there is little support and discussion to support a newbie programmer. Also I believe a graphic display of user input and the program outputs would be much easier to understand. Reading off the instructions are too open to interpretation.
There is also the grading scheme is not fine-grained enough. It could utilized better to provide a more structured approach to a solution.
loop (1 mark)
use of map ( 1 mark)
user of slice ( 1 mark)
So there will be 10 chcekpoints to verify and validate.
Using 2 points as aggregate scores, did not help to achieve that goal. It penalised students excessively in my opinins.