Oct 03, 2018
Superb course,\n\nI definitely understand Golang far better than I did when I originally started it!
Nov 15, 2018
A nice course which introduces necessary concepts in programming within Go.
교육 기관: Phil H•
Jul 10, 2019
An ok course. Lots of annoying typos in the slides, and the instructor seems to stumble over some of the explanation. In the end, it did teach me the basics of go functions and OO concepts.
교육 기관: 李度•
Jul 03, 2019
although this is a very very easy course for people who have programming experience before, the course is still has some great interpretation about golang’s grammar feature
교육 기관: Maxim C•
Jun 28, 2019
Still there are errors in the tests
교육 기관: Adel F•
Jun 24, 2019
Learned a bit on go syntax and how polymorphism works.
Thanks the instructor. Good learning experience overall.
교육 기관: Akash & T•
Jun 23, 2019
basic but a good intro!
교육 기관: David L•
Jun 16, 2019
Not an intermediate course, more like a beginner course for me. Too much background info which is not go related eg why functions, what are good properties of functions, this is too generic and beginner material
Examples are not good: bad variable and function names, non-practical or even confusing/misleading
Important topics are covered, explainations are ok (but could be better)
교육 기관: Joseph F•
May 29, 2019
Peer-reviewed assignments are problematic and frustrating. I would never pay for a course that didn't have a TF/TA or Professor grading the assignments. Students can't possibly make judgement calls on code; else the code becomes very narrow and cookie-cutter.
교육 기관: Justin L•
May 23, 2019
some homework questions are wrong
교육 기관: Alec J•
May 21, 2019
I'll say again what I said regarding the first course in this series. The teacher is good, and the material is valuable, but the fact that students have to grade each others' work is ridiculous, and actually kind of angering, if I'm honest. Why would you trust me to grade someone else's work, while I'm learning it at the same time they are? Who knows? Maybe I'm an idiot. Even if I'm bright and hard-working, I won't have the same insight as an instructor would, looking at the same material. This is pedagogically difficult to justify, and I can only believe that it's meant to shield the instructor from the drudgery of the task.
교육 기관: Terence S•
May 19, 2019
There were a few inaccuracies which might be confusing for newcomers to the language. It would be good if the instructor or someone else with editing permissions could take a look at the feedback and act on it.
교육 기관: Sylvain T•
May 14, 2019
The topic is good, however the videos really have this old-school touch- you know, the very reason you choose to go to Coursera and not back to some class bench. Evaluations would also benefit from a good review, too much frustating inconsistencies for my (and many people on the forums) taste.
교육 기관: 壹叶随心•
May 13, 2019
It's very nice.
교육 기관: yichen z•
May 03, 2019
교육 기관: Flavio S T•
Apr 22, 2019
The course is extremely basic, not very complete, and full of errors that are being dragged through multiple months, the errors have been flagged on the forums, and they are never fixed. The grading is made by peer review - which could be a good thing, but the rubric for grading are could be completely automated, and it isn't.
교육 기관: Serge T•
Mar 25, 2019
quite a lot of mistakes in study materials and tests
교육 기관: Yuheng C•
Mar 21, 2019
A little more typos on the slides ...
교육 기관: Edward H•
Mar 20, 2019
The programming assignment workload is reasonable, but there is little support and discussion to support a newbie programmer. Also I believe a graphic display of user input and the program outputs would be much easier to understand. Reading off the instructions are too open to interpretation.
There is also the grading scheme is not fine-grained enough. It could utilized better to provide a more structured approach to a solution.
loop (1 mark)
use of map ( 1 mark)
user of slice ( 1 mark)
So there will be 10 chcekpoints to verify and validate.
Using 2 points as aggregate scores, did not help to achieve that goal. It penalised students excessively in my opinins.
교육 기관: Robin Z•
Mar 20, 2019
Nice follow-up on the first course, wish more focus would have been put on using interfaces
교육 기관: Armin K•
Mar 13, 2019
Way too easy and way too little background information or depth, plus lack of real-world examples and a lot of inaccurate information.
교육 기관: Vsevolod V•
Mar 09, 2019
Quizzes and assignments contain mistakes, which make it hard (and in some cases impossible) to make it right.
교육 기관: Dang V D•
Feb 19, 2019
Great course, good structure
교육 기관: Michael W•
Feb 12, 2019
Great Class! Excellent coverage of basic tools provided by Go
교육 기관: Gustavo H M d S•
Jan 27, 2019
Great Course! The part about interfaces could have been a little clearer, but I was able to get through it!
교육 기관: Leam H•
Jan 22, 2019
I enjoyed the class. The instructor presents well and is easy to listen to. The course is not for a beginner programmer! The first course in the series would be very helpful if you have no experience with Go. Most of the measurable objectives (quizzes and coding assignments) require more than just watching the videos. Still, if you already code in a C based language (C, Perl, Python, Ruby, etc) and can look things up you should do well.
교육 기관: sebastien6•
Jan 07, 2019
Couple of interesting chapters and assignment. I though an additional chapter related to benchmark and testing is missing however in this module. Could make a great add on with assignment to test and benchmark latest assignment of the module.